The “Mike Postle cheating” incident has been complicated and confusing, and now the case has made new progress. That is, Mike Postle’s defamation lawsuit will continue until April.

The cause and effect of the “Mike Postle cheating” case:

Mike Postle cheating case

In 2019, Veronica Brill boldly stated that Mike Postle cheated several times during the Stones live broadcast and filed charges against him. About the poker cheating, most poker players are also on her side. But Veronica Brill’s main accusation evidence has not been confirmed by the court. Mike Postle then quickly denied these allegations and insisted on his innocence.

Next, Veronica Brill and 87 other plaintiffs hired a poker lawyer to formally sue Mike Postle. But the case was still dismissed. And the court’s final decision disappointed people who were concerned about the matter, including Veronica Brill, of course. But she continued to insist on her statement.

After the civil lawsuit was dismissed, Mike Postle fought back and filed a lawsuit against Veronica Brill and many members of the poker community for alleged defamation, demanding compensation of US$330 million.

By this year, the plaintiffs of the case still did not give up the lawsuit against him. The latest legal update also failed to bring Mike Postle a good result, which means that his two appeals were rejected by the court.

Veronica Brill then used California’s anti-SLAPP laws to counter Mike Postle’s legal attacks. At the time when things were tumultuous, the lawyer hired by Mike Postle chose to resign due to a lack of communication with Mike Postle.

Just as the case gradually faded out of public view, it made a comeback again.

Last Thursday, Judge Shama Mesiwala of the California Supreme Court heard a debate between Mike Postle and the defendant in a $330 million defamation lawsuit filed by Mike Postle.

The notorious Mike Postle requested that the case be postponed for 120 days on the grounds that he did not have enough lawyers to defend himself. Judge Mesiwala then approved his application but did not give him the time he wanted. Instead, he ordered the next hearing of the case on April 20.

Judge Mesiwala admitted after the trial that the postponement hindered many aspects of the case and Mike Postle’s behavior was abnormal. It is also quite rare for him to request a postponement of the hearing. Even if he has accepted and passed the application, he still finds it unusual.

The next case hearing date for the case is April 20, when Mike Postle will either have a lawyer to represent him or he must take other actions. Even if Mike Postle can be defended, the judge, in this case, is unlikely to extend the trial again.

We will wait and see what kind of trial the case will eventually get!